ANTALYA BAM TO THE RELEVANT LEGAL DEPARTMENT
To Be Sent
ALANYA 1.TO THE FAMILY COURT
FILE NO. :2021/ÇÇÇE E. 2022/CHC K.
THE APPLICANT PLAINTIFF :K.S. 12345678910
ADDRESS:…
DEPUTY :Av.
DEFENDANT :S.K. 12345678910
DEPUTY :Av.
SUBJECT : The appeal includes our application consists of the submission of our petition.
D E S C R I P T I O N S
We are applying for the legal way of appeal against the local court decision, the basis of which we have indicated above, within the time limit. That is to say;
1-The decision of the local court to return the jewelry in accordance with our request in our original case is in accordance with the law, and we have no say in the partial acceptance decision.
2-Our main case, which was given by the Local Court, is also partially rejected in terms of the trappings we have requested, the decision is contrary to the procedure, merits and law.
3-In accordance with the local court decision, our request for the return of the single stone and 2,000 TL money was rejected.
However, the Supreme Court 3.HD 2016/6315 Basis, in accordance with the Decision numbered 2017/17405 Decision; “rest with the defendant at the plaintiff’s witnesses, the witness ‘…’ s (the father of the defendant), the defendant in the direction where the declaration in April solitaire ring is attached with one of plaintiff’s Witnesses …’s, when you are in the defendant’s home, “when we asked the defendant of the defendant’s mother angry and throwing a single stone ring the ring and said he couldn’t find it again” in the form of statements, considering the case by the defendant because of the single stone engagement ring has been a gift and it is understood that the party are not returned by the defendant and, therefore, by the court, in the case the case must be decided upon the adoption of a single stone ring in terms of demand when, the rejection of this request was not considered correct, and this issue necessitated the deterioration of the provision.” Stating that the one stone ring is not a regular item and decided that it should be returned.
In addition, the plaintiff and the defendant are identified by the witnesses defendant-K.although it has been declared that 2.000 TL money was attached to the plaintiff due to the engagement, the decision of the local court to reject this request is also contrary to the procedure, merits and law in this aspect.
3-In terms of the counterclaim, the local court decision is in accordance with the law and we have nothing to say.
CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: With the acceptance of our application for appeal in terms of the trappings rejected by the local court in the original case for the reasons mentioned above and to be determined ex officio, we submit and request the cancellation of the local court decision. Sincerely …/…/202.
You can reach our other articles, sample decisions and petitions by clicking here